Defining and Certifying Diversity: Affirmative Action

98 Pages Posted: 16 Dec 2001

Abstract

This article is a chapter of my forthcoming book Diversity in America: Keeping Government at a Safe Distance (Harvard U. P., early 2003). The book also contains chapters on a conceptualization/taxonomy of diversity ("The Diversity of Diversity"), an intellectual history of diversity-as-ideal (just published as "The Perceived Values of Diversity, Then and Now," 22 Cardozo L. Rev. 1915 (2001)), and chapters analyzing the law and policy governing immigration-related diversity, diversity in residential communities, and religious diversity. There are also introductory and concluding chapters.

This article consists of ten sections: (1) an introduction; (2) the definitions, designs, and domains of affirmative action; (3) the importance of context in assessments of affirmative action; (4) the size of affirmative action preferences in different domains, especially higher education; (5) rationales and counter-rationales for ethno-racial preferences (restitution, merit, anti-caste, leadership cadre, market failure, institutional pragmatism, and diversity); (6) the politics of affirmative action (political history, public attitudes, and political survival); (7) the consequences of affirmative action (rate of black progress, distribution of benefits in and outside the favored group, and incidence and distribution of costs); (8) the re-segregation nightmare; (9) alternatives (better targeting within favored groups, disadvantage-based preferences, lottery, addressing root causes, time-limited programs, and voluntary programs); and (10) a conclusion.

Prescriptively, I argue that whether or not the diversity rationale for legally-mandated ethno-racial preferences in higher education (and probably elsewhere) can pass constitutional muster (apart from the narrow opening under the Court's Paradise test), public law preferences are unjust and unwise, and are steadily becoming more so. Private preferences, however, are acceptable if the entities using them publicly disclose the nature and magnitude of those preferences and do not discriminate against blacks and other minorities entitled to the highest level of protection under the Constitution.

Suggested Citation

Schuck, Peter H., Defining and Certifying Diversity: Affirmative Action. Schuck, Peter H., DIVERSITY IN AMERICA: KEEPING GOVERNMENT AT A SAFE DISTANCE, Harvard University Press, 2003; and Yale Law & Policy Review, Vol. 20, No. 1, January 2002 (under the title, Affirmative Action: Past, Present, and Future). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=292096 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.292096

Peter H. Schuck (Contact Author)

Yale University - Law School ( email )

P.O. Box 208215
New Haven, CT 06520-8215
United States

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
685
rank
36,062
Abstract Views
3,409
PlumX Metrics
!

Under construction: SSRN citations while be offline until July when we will launch a brand new and improved citations service, check here for more details.

For more information