Gender Homophily in Referral Networks: Consequences for the Medicare Physician Earnings Gap

61 Pages Posted: 23 Feb 2017 Last revised: 16 Dec 2017

Dan Zeltzer

Tel Aviv University - Eitan Berglas School of Economics

Multiple version iconThere are 2 versions of this paper

Date Written: February 21, 2017

Abstract

In this paper, I assess the extent to which the gender gap in physician earnings may be driven by physicians’ preference for working with specialists of the same gender. By analyzing administrative data on 100 million Medicare patient referrals, I provide robust evidence that doctors refer more to specialists of their same gender, a tendency known as homophily. I propose a new measure of homophily that is invariant to differences between the genders in the propensity to refer or receive referrals. I show that biased referrals are predominantly driven by physicians’ decisions rather than by endogenous sorting of physicians or patients or by gender differences in the labor supply. As 75% of doctors are men, estimates suggest biased referrals generate a 5% lower demand for female relative to male specialists, pointing to a positive externality for increased female participation in medicine.

Keywords: Networks, Referrals, Gender Gap, Physician Markets

JEL Classification: I11, J16, L14

Suggested Citation

Zeltzer, Dan, Gender Homophily in Referral Networks: Consequences for the Medicare Physician Earnings Gap (February 21, 2017). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2921482 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2921482

Dan Zeltzer (Contact Author)

Tel Aviv University - Eitan Berglas School of Economics ( email )

P.O. Box 39040
Ramat Aviv, Tel Aviv, 69978
Israel
+972(3)640-5824 (Phone)

HOME PAGE: http://www.tau.ac.il/~dzeltzer

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
183
rank
142,496
Abstract Views
818
PlumX