The Dictionary as a Specialized Corpus

33 Pages Posted: 22 Feb 2017 Last revised: 8 May 2018

Jennifer Mascott

George Mason University - Antonin Scalia Law School, Faculty

Date Written: May 7, 2018

Abstract

Scholars consider reliance on dictionary definitions to be the antithesis of objective, big-data analysis of ordinary meaning. This Article contests that notion, arguing that when dictionaries are treated as a specialized database, or corpus, they provide invaluable textured understanding of a term. Words appear in dictionaries both as terms being defined and as terms defining other words. Examination of every reference to a contested term throughout a dictionary’s definitional entries of other words may substantially benefit statutory and constitutional interpretation. Because dictionaries catalog language, their use as a specialized corpus provides invaluable insight into the ways a particular word is used in relation to terms throughout the English language. Such evidence provides a crucial interpretive launchpad, even for corpus-based researchers looking for a collection of possible word meanings to analyze in a database of ordinary-language documents.

Keywords: corpus linguistics, statutory interpretation, constitutional interpretation, dictionaries

Suggested Citation

Mascott, Jennifer, The Dictionary as a Specialized Corpus (May 7, 2018). 2017 BYU L. Rev. 1557 (2018); George Mason Legal Studies Research Paper No. LS 17-22. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2922094

Jennifer Mascott (Contact Author)

George Mason University - Antonin Scalia Law School, Faculty ( email )

3301 Fairfax Drive
Arlington, VA 22201
United States
(703) 993-8168 (Phone)

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
83
rank
272,376
Abstract Views
362
PlumX