The Role of Precedents as a Filter for Argumentation

Revista da AGU, Brasília-DF, v. 15, n. 03, p. 233-262, jul./sept, 2016.

27 Pages Posted: 24 Feb 2017

Date Written: July 2016

Abstract

This essay examines the role and the limits of a theory of precedent in promoting the values of legal certainty, equality, legitimacy, and efficiency of the courts. It demonstrates, further, that precedents have another major role: they serve as a filter for legal argumentation, guiding litigants and judges on the issues to be discussed and considered in the decision of a case. With this objective, section I clarifies the relationship between the use of precedents and the values mentioned above. Section II demonstrates the manner in which precedents are applied. Section III analyses the subjective and institutional elements that also influence judicial behavior. Finally, section IV presents the conclusion, highlighting the importance of precedents for legal reasoning. The essay uses the North American theory of precedent as a starting point for its analysis.

Keywords: Precedents, ratio decidendi, obiter dictum, leadind and hard cases, overruling

Suggested Citation

Mello, Patrícia Perrone Campos, The Role of Precedents as a Filter for Argumentation (July 2016). Revista da AGU, Brasília-DF, v. 15, n. 03, p. 233-262, jul./sept, 2016., Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2922112 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2922112

Patrícia Perrone Campos Mello (Contact Author)

Centro Universitário de Brasília (UniCEUB) ( email )

SEPN 707/909 - Campus UniCEUB
Asa Norte
Brasilia, DF 70790-075
Brazil

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
52
Abstract Views
295
rank
447,534
PlumX Metrics