Attorney-Client Confidentiality: A Critical Analysis

15 Pages Posted: 24 Feb 2017 Last revised: 9 May 2017

See all articles by William H. Simon

William H. Simon

Stanford University - Stanford Law School; Columbia University - Law School

Date Written: February 23, 2017

Abstract

Attorney-client confidentiality doctrine is distinguished by its expansiveness and its rigid or categorical form. This brief essay argues that the rationales for these features are unpersuasive. It compares the “strong confidentiality” of current doctrine to a hypothetical narrower and more flexible “moderate confidentiality” and concludes that moderate confidentiality is more plausible. It is unlikely that current doctrine yields benefits that justify its costs.

Keywords: Attorney-Client Confidentiality, Confidentiality, Strong Confidentiality, Moderate Confidentiality

Suggested Citation

Simon, William H., Attorney-Client Confidentiality: A Critical Analysis (February 23, 2017). Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics, Forthcoming, Columbia Public Law Research Paper No. 14-539, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2922744

William H. Simon (Contact Author)

Stanford University - Stanford Law School ( email )

559 Nathan Abbott Way
Stanford, CA 94305-8610
United States
(650) 723-4605 (Phone)

Columbia University - Law School ( email )

435 West 116th Street
Jerome Greene Hall, Mailbox A-18
New York, NY 10027
United States
212-854-9215 (Phone)
212-854-7946 (Fax)

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
553
Abstract Views
2,029
Rank
101,174
PlumX Metrics