Eating Is Not Political Action

12 Pages Posted: 6 Sep 2017 Last revised: 20 Jun 2018

See all articles by Joshua Galperin

Joshua Galperin

University of Pittsburgh - School of Law; Yale Law School; Yale School of Forestry and Environmental Studies

Graham Downey

Yale Law School

D. Lee Miller

Duke University School of Law

Date Written: Spring 2017

Abstract

Food and environment are cultural stalwarts. Picture the red barn and solitary farmer toiling over fruited plains; or purple mountains majesty reflected in pristine waters. Agriculture and environment are core, distinct, American mythologies that we know are more intertwined than our stories reveal.

To create policy at the interface of such centrally important and overlapping American ideals, there are two options. Passive governance fosters markets in which participants make individual choices that aggregate into inadvertent collective action. In contrast, assertive governance allows the public, mediated through elected officials, to enact intentional, goal oriented policy.

American mythologies of food and environment arise because each is important culturally and physically. Given their essentiality, we must demand more intentionality, must demand policies not only because they are possible, but because they are thoughtful, effective, goal oriented, and intentional. Food and the environment are both too important to do otherwise.

In today’s political climate, finding shared goals will be hard and accidental policy may be the best we can hope for in the short term. Progressive food advocates may settle for passive policies because these policies make fewer normative commitments. For three decades this has been exactly the strategy of environmental advocates. It is the wrong strategy. Without boldly speaking about our goals, even when we know we will fall short, we cannot imagine the big picture that we intend to paint, the new integrated mythology we intend to write.

Keywords: food, environment, agriculture, USDA, policy, advocacy, progressive, politics, environmentalism, poultry, chickens, integrators, pollution, neoliberalism, GMO, genetically modified organisms, labels, dietary guidelines, Obama, Trump, Conservation Reserve Program, CRP, Whole Farm Revenue Program

Suggested Citation

Galperin, Joshua and Downey, Graham and Miller, D. Lee, Eating Is Not Political Action (Spring 2017). 13 J. Food L. & Pol'y 113 (2017); U. of Pittsburgh Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2018-14. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2925846

Joshua Galperin (Contact Author)

University of Pittsburgh - School of Law ( email )

3900 Forbes Ave.
Pittsburgh, PA 15260
United States

HOME PAGE: http://law.pitt.edu/people/joshua-galperin

Yale Law School ( email )

P.O. Box 208215
New Haven, CT 06520-8215
United States
203 431 1164 (Phone)

Yale School of Forestry and Environmental Studies ( email )

New Haven, CT 06520
United States
203 432 1164 (Phone)

Graham Downey

Yale Law School ( email )

P.O. Box 208215
New Haven, CT 06520-8215
United States

D. Lee Miller

Duke University School of Law ( email )

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
64
Abstract Views
589
rank
340,879
PlumX Metrics