Download this Paper Open PDF in Browser

Longevity Risk: To Bear or to Insure?

57 Pages Posted: 3 Mar 2017  

Ling-Ni Boon

Tilburg University

Marie Briere

Amundi Asset Management; Paris Dauphine University; Université Libre de Bruxelles

Bas J. M. Werker

Tilburg University - Center for Economic Research (CentER)

Date Written: February 28, 2017


We compare two longevity risk management contracts in retirement: a collective arrangement that distributes the risk among participants, and a market-provided annuity contract. We evaluate the contracts’ appeal with respect to the retiree’s welfare, and the viability of the market solution through the financial reward to the annuity provider’s equity holders. The collective agreement yields marginally higher individual welfare than an annuity contract priced at its best estimate, and the annuity provider is incapable of adequately compensating its equity holders for bearing longevity risk. Therefore, market-provided annuity contracts would not co-exist with collective schemes.

Keywords: longevity risk, group self-annuitization (GSA), insurance, variable annuity

JEL Classification: D14, E21, G22, G23

Suggested Citation

Boon, Ling-Ni and Briere, Marie and Werker, Bas J. M., Longevity Risk: To Bear or to Insure? (February 28, 2017). Available at SSRN: or

Ling-Ni Boon

Tilburg University ( email )

P.O. Box 90153
Tilburg, 5000 LE

Marie Briere (Contact Author)

Amundi Asset Management ( email )

90 Boulevard Pasteur
Paris, 75015

Paris Dauphine University ( email )

place du Maréchal de Lattre de Tassigny
Paris, 75016

Université Libre de Bruxelles ( email )


Bas J.M. Werker

Tilburg University - Center for Economic Research (CentER) ( email )

Econometrics and Finance Group
5000 LE Tilburg

Paper statistics

Abstract Views