On What We Know

16 Pages Posted: 16 Mar 2017

Date Written: March 14, 2017


On what we know presents the reasoning behind the proposition that knowledge is not continuous. It follows that there is no ‘scientific reductionism’ with major consequences for psychology, with mind not being ‘reducible’ to the functioning of the brain. The paper concludes with questions to continue the line of thinking in improving our understanding of the external world and ourselves as part of that world.

Keywords: scientific reductionism, scientific methodology, Ashby tools, psychology, epistemology

JEL Classification: Z1, Z10, 03, 031, 033

Suggested Citation

Little, Graham, On What We Know (March 14, 2017). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2933169 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2933169

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics