What MDL and Class Actions Have in Common

10 Pages Posted: 20 Mar 2017

Date Written: 2017


This short article responds to Elizabeth Chamblee Burch's article, Monopolies in Multidistrict Litigation, 70 Vand. L. Rev. 67 (2017). Burch argues that lawyers in MDL leadership positions use their power to negotiate settlements that favor themselves over the plaintiffs they purport to represent. She points to particular terms that lawyers routinely insert in mass settlements. She contrasts MDL with class actions, where procedural safeguards presumably protect class members' interests. My response contends that Burch's concerns about MDL are on target, but that class actions, rather than providing a neat contrast, reveal powerful parallels to the ethical and procedural concerns she identifies in MDL. The article looks at the similarities and differences between class actions and MDL in terms of the risk of self-serving conduct by lawyers in the negotiation of collective settlements.

Keywords: class action, MDL, multidistrict litigation, aggregate settlement, settlement, Rule 23, class counsel, mass torts, mass tort litigation

JEL Classification: K41

Suggested Citation

Erichson, Howard M., What MDL and Class Actions Have in Common (2017). 70 Vanderbilt Law Review En Banc 29 (2017). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2935260

Howard M. Erichson (Contact Author)

Fordham University School of Law ( email )

150 West 62nd Street
New York, NY 10023
United States
646-312-8233 (Phone)

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics