Download this Paper Open PDF in Browser

Beyond Legal Reasoning: A Critique of Pure Lawyering (Preface)

Beyond Legal Reasoning: A Critique of Pure Lawyering (Routledge, 2017)

Suffolk University Law School Research Paper No. #17-8

11 Pages Posted: 22 Mar 2017 Last revised: 24 Mar 2017

Jeffrey M. Lipshaw

Suffolk University Law School

Date Written: March 20, 2017

Abstract

This is the Preface to Beyond Legal Reasoning: A Critique of Pure Lawyering (Routledge, 2017) (ISBN: 978-1138221307).

The book provides a critique of the traditional views of “thinking like a lawyer” or “pure lawyering,” aimed at lawyers, law professors, and students who want to understand lawyering beyond the traditional warrior metaphor. Drawing examples from the intersection of real world law and business issues, the book argues the “pure lawyering” of traditional legal education is agnostic to either truth or moral value of outcomes. It offers a critique of pure lawyering’s potential both for illusions of certainty and cynical instrumentalism, and the consequences of both when lawyers are called on as dealmakers, policymakers, and counsellors.

Keywords: Legal reasoning, deduction, induction, abductive reasoning, theory, description, normativity, transactional law, legal education, instrumentalism, self-deception, blame, causation, models

JEL Classification: K10, K12, K20, K40

Suggested Citation

Lipshaw, Jeffrey M., Beyond Legal Reasoning: A Critique of Pure Lawyering (Preface) (March 20, 2017). Beyond Legal Reasoning: A Critique of Pure Lawyering (Routledge, 2017); Suffolk University Law School Research Paper No. #17-8. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2937245 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2937245

Jeffrey Lipshaw (Contact Author)

Suffolk University Law School ( email )

120 Tremont Street
Boston, MA 02108-4977
United States

HOME PAGE: http://ssrn.com/author=381790

Paper statistics

Downloads
121
Rank
200,100
Abstract Views
416