Are Branch Banks Better Survivors? Evidence from the Depression Era

39 Pages Posted: 16 Dec 2001

See all articles by Mark A. Carlson

Mark A. Carlson

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

Date Written: December 2001

Abstract

It is widely argued in the literature on the Great Depression that the prevalence of unit banks aggravated the problem of financial instability that afflicted the country. This paper tests the theory that more widespread branch banking would have reduced financial turbulence in the United States by examining the survival of individual branch and unit banks. Results indicate that instead of being more likely to survive, branch banks were more likely to fail. Further investigation suggests that this higher failure rate occurred because branch banks systematically held riskier portfolios than unit banks.

Keywords: Branch banking, great depression

JEL Classification: G21, N22

Suggested Citation

Carlson, Mark A., Are Branch Banks Better Survivors? Evidence from the Depression Era (December 2001). FRB FEDS Discussion Paper No. 2001-51, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=293885 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.293885

Mark A. Carlson (Contact Author)

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System ( email )

20th Street and Constitution Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20551
United States
(202) 452-3987 (Phone)
(202) 452-2301 (Fax)

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
164
Abstract Views
1,691
Rank
330,300
PlumX Metrics