Unresolved Legal Questions Concerning Operation Inherent Resolve

32 Pages Posted: 4 Apr 2017

See all articles by Oren Gross

Oren Gross

University of Minnesota Law School

Date Written: April 1, 2017

Abstract

Since August 2014, the United States and several of its allies have been embroiled in military operations against the Islamic State of Iraq and al-Sham (ISIS) in Iraq, Syria, and later on also in Libya. Those military engagements raise a plethora of vexing legal questions both on the domestic, constitutional law plane in the United States and on the international level. This Article seeks to explore and examine the legal justifications for the United States’ military operations against ISIS under international law.

After briefly sketching the rise of ISIS and the contours of Operation Inherent Resolve, the Article examines critically the four main legal justifications put forward in support of the U.S.’ (and its allies’) military operations against ISIS, namely acting in pursuance of Security Council authorization (in reliance on Security Council Resolution 2249 of 2015), invitation by the Iraqi government to its friends and allies to intervene militarily in order to defeat ISIS, claims of humanitarian intervention, and last, but not least, arguments that in pursuing military options the United States exercises its inherent right for individual or collective self-defense.

Suggested Citation

Gross, Oren, Unresolved Legal Questions Concerning Operation Inherent Resolve (April 1, 2017). Texas International Law Journal, Vol. 52, 2017. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2944790

Oren Gross (Contact Author)

University of Minnesota Law School ( email )

229 19th Avenue South, #430
Minneapolis, MN 55455
United States
612-624-7521 (Phone)
612-625-2011 (Fax)

HOME PAGE: http://www.tc.umn.edu/~gross084

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
152
Abstract Views
684
rank
193,299
PlumX Metrics