‘Tensions and Contradictions in Australian Social Policy Reform: Compulsory Income Management and the National Disability Insurance Scheme’

51(4) Australian Journal of Social Issues 399-417.

Posted: 4 Apr 2017

See all articles by Greg Marston

Greg Marston

Queensland University of Technology

Sally Cowling

Centre for Research, Innovation and Advocacy at Uniting NSW

Shelley Bielefeld

Griffith University - Griffith Law School; School of Regulation and Global Governance (RegNet)

Date Written: December 15, 2016

Abstract

This paper explores contemporary contradictions and tensions in Australian social policy principles and governmental practices that are being used to drive behavioural change, such as compulsory income management. By means of compulsory income management the Australian Government determines how certain categories of income support recipients can spend their payments through the practice of quarantining a proportion of that payment. In this process some groups in the community, particularly young unemployed people and Indigenous Australians, are being portrayed as requiring a paternalistic push in order to make responsible choices. The poverty experienced by some groups of income support recipients appears to be seen as a consequence of poor spending patterns rather than economic and social inequalities. By contrast, Australia’s National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) has been constructed as a person-centred system of support that recognises the importance of both human agency and structural investment to expand personal choices and control. Here we look at the rationale guiding these developments to explore the tensions and contradictions in social policy more broadly, identifying what would be required if governments sought to promote greater autonomy, dignity and respect for people receiving income support payments in Australia.

Keywords: income management, justice, disability insurance, social welfare policy, Indigenous peoples

Suggested Citation

Marston, Greg and Cowling, Sally and Bielefeld, Shelley, ‘Tensions and Contradictions in Australian Social Policy Reform: Compulsory Income Management and the National Disability Insurance Scheme’ (December 15, 2016). 51(4) Australian Journal of Social Issues 399-417., Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2945218

Greg Marston

Queensland University of Technology ( email )

Sally Cowling

Centre for Research, Innovation and Advocacy at Uniting NSW ( email )

Shelley Bielefeld (Contact Author)

Griffith University - Griffith Law School ( email )

Nathan Campus, GU
Nathan 4111
Australia

School of Regulation and Global Governance (RegNet) ( email )

Canberra, Australian Capital Territory 2601
Australia

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
302
PlumX Metrics