Journal of Corporate Law Studies, Vol. 2001, No. 2, December 2001
Posted: 15 Apr 2002
This paper takes the opportunity, presented by the House of Lords' decision in Phillips v Brewin Dolphin, to examine the law governing the reversal of transactions at an undervalue entered into by a company which then becomes insolvent. The paper discusses the sequence in which issues related to ascertaining whether a transaction had been at an undervalue are to be approached, the proposition that contracts somehow "linked" with each other can be taken together as constituting a single "transaction", and the prior question about when such contracts should be considered "linked" in the first place. Finally, the paper detects something of a tendency in the case law to use the notion of a transaction at an undervalue to brush aside inconveniences arising from the peculiarities in the way certain cases have been pleaded. Notably, it suggests that Phillips v Brewin Dolphin might not have involved any transaction at an undervalue at basall.
Keywords: bankruptcy; undervalue transactions
JEL Classification: G33, K22, K42
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Mokal, Riz and Ho, Look Chan, Consideration, Characterisation, Evaluation: Transactions at an Undervalue after 'Phillips v Brewin Dolphin'. Journal of Corporate Law Studies, Vol. 2001, No. 2, December 2001. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=294619