Brief of Amici Curiae Law Professors in Support of Microsoft Corp. In Microsoft v. Department of Justice (ECPA Gag Order Litigation)

23 Pages Posted: 10 May 2018

Date Written: April 4, 2017

Abstract

Amici curiae law professors, whose work focuses on privacy, technology, security, and constitutional law, write to assist the Court by providing important context for the Government’s motion to dismiss Microsoft’s challenge to secrecy orders under 18 U.S.C. § 2705(b) that accompany digital searches and seizures. That provision of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (“ECPA”), which authorizes “preclusion of notice,” violates historical and modern understandings of the First and Fourth Amendments because it allows the Government to indefinitely bar online service providers from speaking publicly or notifying users about the seizures they effect at the Government’s behest. Section 2705(b) is therefore unconstitutional.

Keywords: Electronic Privacy Communications Act, ECPA, gag orders, non-disclosure orders, secrecy, surveillance, surveillance transparency, First Amendment, Fourth Amendment

Suggested Citation

Manes, Jonathan and Southwell, Alexander and Gillett, Gabriel, Brief of Amici Curiae Law Professors in Support of Microsoft Corp. In Microsoft v. Department of Justice (ECPA Gag Order Litigation) (April 4, 2017). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2946282

Jonathan Manes (Contact Author)

Northwestern University - Roderick & Solange MacArthur Justice Center ( email )

160 E Grand Ave, 6th Floor
Chicago, IL 60611
United States

Yale Law School - Information Society Project ( email )

P.O. Box 208215
New Haven, CT 06520-8215
United States

Alexander Southwell

Independent ( email )

Gabriel Gillett

Independent ( email )

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
4
Abstract Views
64
PlumX Metrics