On Government Centralization and Budget Referendums: Evidence from Switzerland
36 Pages Posted: 14 Jan 2002
Date Written: December 2001
Abstract
Previous theoretical and empirical research has shown that policymakers have an incentive to centralize government activities in order to weaken the competitive pressure of fiscal federalism. We propose and test a positive model of fiscal federalism in which centralization is less likely to occur where budget referendums are possible. The reason for this result is that budget referendums reduce the extent to which pro-centralization regions can commit to a low level of spending delegating the centralization choice to elected policymakers. In addition, it reduces the ability of higher level policy-makers to attract additional responsibilities in order to gain policy discretion. Empirical findings from a panel data analysis for Swiss cantons from 1980 to 1998 support this hypothesis.
Keywords: Centralization, Fiscal Federalism, Budget Referendums
JEL Classification: H1, H7, D72
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
By Matthias Benz and Alois Stutzer
-
The Impact of Voter Initiatives on Economic Activity
By Akila Weerapana, S. Brock Blomberg, ...
-
Direct Democracy: Designing a Living Constitution
By Bruno S. Frey and Alois Stutzer
-
Who Controls? Information and the Structure of Legislative Decision Making
By Arthur Lupia and Mathew D. Mccubbins
-
The Role of Direct Democracy in the European Union
By Lars P. Feld and Gebhard Kirchgässner
-
The Economic Effects of Direct Democracy - A First Global Assessment
By Lorenz Blume, Jens Müller, ...
-
Making International Organizations More Democratic
By Alois Stutzer and Bruno S. Frey
-
The Economic Effects of Direct Democracy - a Cross-Country Assessment
By Stefan Voigt and Lorenz Blume