Regulating Inductive Reasoning In Sexual Assault Cases

Berger, Ben; Cunliffe, Emma; and Stribopoulos, James; TO ENSURE THAT JUSTICE IS DONE: ESSAYS IN MEMORY OF MARC ROSENBERG (Toronto: 2017, Carswell)

24 Pages Posted: 11 Apr 2017 Last revised: 27 Nov 2018

See all articles by David M Tanovich

David M Tanovich

University of Windsor - Faculty of Law

Date Written: April 8, 2017

Abstract

Justice Marc Rosenberg will be remembered as one of Canada’s greatest criminal law jurists by those fortunate enough to have worked with him, to have appeared before him, and now, by those who study and rely on his jurisprudence. He was a jurist who cared deeply about the fairness of the criminal justice system and he strived in every decision to arrive at a just result on the law and the facts. Many of Justice Rosenberg’s judgments reflect a concern for the constant struggle of triers of fact to accurately and fairly assess the credibility and reliability of evidence in determining historical events whether it be the testimony of the accused or central Crown witness. This piece explores three decisions from Justice Rosenberg which highlight the different ways in which stereotyping can distort the assessment of credibility and reliability in sexual assault cases: R v. Levert, R v. Rand and, R v. Stark.

An important aspect of ensuring accuracy and fairness for Justice Rosenberg was the need to carefully regulate inductive reasoning: the engine that drives judicial reasoning and, ultimately, fact finding. The tools used for inductive reasoning include the decision maker’s or the law’s application of what it sees as common sense, logic and human experience. As an endeavour that explicitly relies on so-called common sense and generalizations about human experience, which shift with time, inductive reasoning can be highly subjective and can easily become a breeding ground for implicit bias, discriminatory stereotyping and unreliable decision-making.

Keywords: Sexual Assault, Stereotyping, Inductive Reasoning, Justice Marc Rosenberg

Suggested Citation

Tanovich, David M, Regulating Inductive Reasoning In Sexual Assault Cases (April 8, 2017). Berger, Ben; Cunliffe, Emma; and Stribopoulos, James; TO ENSURE THAT JUSTICE IS DONE: ESSAYS IN MEMORY OF MARC ROSENBERG (Toronto: 2017, Carswell). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2949147

David M Tanovich (Contact Author)

University of Windsor - Faculty of Law ( email )

401 Sunset Avenue
Windsor, Ontario N9B 3P4
Canada
519-253-3000 (ext. 2966) (Phone)

HOME PAGE: http://www.uwindsor.ca/law/tanovich/

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
310
rank
95,097
Abstract Views
1,365
PlumX Metrics