Post-Referendum South Sudan: Political Violence, New Sudan and Democratic Nation-Building

Georgetown Public Policy Review, 2013

15 Pages Posted: 11 Apr 2017

Date Written: May 10, 2013

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to analyze the problem of violence in South Sudan between 2009 and 2012. This study fills the gap in scholarship about the determinants of violence in South Sudan in the period following the Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA). The paper begins with a critique of the existing paradigms of understanding conflicts in Sudan and South Sudan: race (Arab and African), religion (Christian and Muslim), ethnic (native and settler), geographic (north and south), and the tendency to present violence as criminal and not political. It quantifies the determinants of violence, presents frequencies and percent distribution of incidents resulting in deaths, and tabulates the ratio of person(s) killed to number of incidents in the five states most affected by violence: Warrap, Unity, Upper Nile, Jonglei, and Lakes. The second objective of the paper is to discuss an alternative solution to the political crisis facing both countries: citizenship and the need for an inclusive framework to manage diverse populations within a unified nation. The article concludes with a discussion of the New Sudan framework by situating it within the larger debate on democratic nation-building, while discussing its alignment with regional and international law.

Suggested Citation

Zambakari, Christopher, Post-Referendum South Sudan: Political Violence, New Sudan and Democratic Nation-Building (May 10, 2013). Georgetown Public Policy Review, 2013. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2950868

Christopher Zambakari (Contact Author)

The Zambakari Advisory, LLC ( email )

P.O. Box 18691
Phoenix, AZ ARIZONA (AZ) 85005
United States
6026709326 (Phone)

HOME PAGE: http://www.zambakari.org/

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
305
rank
99,955
Abstract Views
239
PlumX Metrics