Download this Paper Open PDF in Browser

The Weakening of Fiduciary Law

Research Handbook On Fiduciary Law, (Andrew S. Gold & D. Gordon Smith eds., 2017) (Forthcoming)

Washington University in St. Louis Legal Studies Research Paper No. 17-04-03

33 Pages Posted: 12 Apr 2017 Last revised: 6 Aug 2017

Andrew F. Tuch

Washington University in Saint Louis - School of Law

Date Written: April 11, 2017

Abstract

In the 1970s and 80s, as major financial institutions grew and diversified their operations, courts and scholars recognized that fiduciary law posed profound challenges for the organizational practices of these firms. The challenges were considered existential by some: firms, ultimately, would need to slim down their operations, and perhaps even need to disaggregate some units, to avoid fiduciary liability. However, since these challenges were recognized, financial conglomerates have grown massively and focused more on taking direct stakes as principals, a practice that accentuates the risk of conflicts of interest.

This chapter examines how financial conglomerates were able to continue growing and diversifying despite the imposition of fiduciary constraints generally seen as robust. It considers potential explanations including the contractual erosion of fiduciary principles, the regulators’ and courts’ legitimation of information barriers as checks on conflicts, the molding of fiduciary law by regulation, the non-enforcement of fiduciary duties by clients, and the shift toward arbitration of client disputes. The chapter generally rejects the view that the contractual erosion of fiduciary law explains weaknesses in the practical effect of fiduciary doctrine and instead points to more pragmatic explanations, focusing particularly on factors that inhibit parties from enforcing fiduciary duties. In considering these explanations, the chapter engages with scholarship that has observed the diminished force of fiduciary law in recent decades.

Keywords: fiduciary duties, organizational structure, conflicts of interest, conflicts of duties, proprietary trading, financial conglomerates, information barriers, Chinese walls, disclaimers, mandatory arbitration

JEL Classification: D40, D70, D80, G21, G24, G30, G34, G38, K10, K19, K22, K39, N20, N80

Suggested Citation

Tuch, Andrew F., The Weakening of Fiduciary Law (April 11, 2017). Research Handbook On Fiduciary Law, (Andrew S. Gold & D. Gordon Smith eds., 2017) (Forthcoming); Washington University in St. Louis Legal Studies Research Paper No. 17-04-03. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2951460

Andrew F. Tuch (Contact Author)

Washington University in Saint Louis - School of Law ( email )

Campus Box 1120
Saint Louis, MO 63130
United States

Paper statistics

Downloads
89
Rank
244,083
Abstract Views
303