White Collar Shortcuts

61 Pages Posted: 14 Apr 2017 Last revised: 24 Apr 2017

Ellen S. Podgor

Stetson University College of Law

Date Written: April 13, 2017

Abstract

In the aftermath of financial and corporate frauds, aggressive government policy is apparent. But while touting a crackdown to correct past prosecution failures, one sees the government using shortcuts in both agency policy and prosecutorial practices. These shortcuts can be seen in the investigative, charging, and plea areas. There is an increased use of search warrants, wiretaps and failures to adhere to criminal discovery obligations. So too, one sees the government charging shortcut offenses such as perjury, obstruction of justice and false statements as opposed to the underlying conduct that was initially being investigated. Taking advantage of over-federalization and over-criminalization is seen in the stacking of multiple charges, tacking on conspiracy and money-laundering offenses, and in adding new plea waivers to secure finality of all issues and avoid future litigation. While these aggressive policy moves may seem efficient, the use of shortcuts has serious consequences that undermine deterrence and legitimacy in the criminal justice process.

Keywords: white-collar crime

JEL Classification: K14, K42

Suggested Citation

Podgor, Ellen S., White Collar Shortcuts (April 13, 2017). University of Illinois Law Review, Vol. 2018, No. 3, 2018, Forthcoming; Stetson University College of Law Research Paper No. 2017-1. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2952212

Ellen S. Podgor (Contact Author)

Stetson University College of Law ( email )

1401 61st Street South
Gulfport, FL 33707
United States
727 562 7348 (Phone)

HOME PAGE: http://www.law.stetson.edu/tmpl/faculty/memberProfile.aspx?id=88

Paper statistics

Downloads
54
Rank
316,944
Abstract Views
166