What Inconsistent Federal Policy Means for Marijuana Business Owners: Washington's I-502 and the Federal Controlled Substances Act

GULR (2014/15) 50-3, 305-335.

32 Pages Posted: 14 Apr 2017 Last revised: 24 Jun 2018

Kimberly Houser

Oklahoma State University

Date Written: February 14, 2015

Abstract

Under current federal law marijuana is still a Schedule I substance which is causing a variety of legal problems for marijuana business owners in states that have recently enacted laws permitting the sale of marijuana for recreational purposes. Because Schedule I labels marijuana as a dangerous addictive drug with no medical uses under federal law, business owners are dealing with numerous challenges relating to banking and taxes in relation to their marijuana dispensaries with the potential threat of federal criminal action. The article first discusses the history of state marijuana laws, Washington State’s policy on marijuana, federal law and enforcement of marijuana laws, and concludes with how federal marijuana policy is impacting businesses in states that have legalized certain uses of marijuana.

Suggested Citation

Houser, Kimberly, What Inconsistent Federal Policy Means for Marijuana Business Owners: Washington's I-502 and the Federal Controlled Substances Act (February 14, 2015). GULR (2014/15) 50-3, 305-335.. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2952402

Kimberly Houser (Contact Author)

Oklahoma State University ( email )

335 Spears College of Business
Stillwater, OK 74074
United States
+1(405)744-9430 (Phone)

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
20
Abstract Views
144
PlumX