What Inconsistent Federal Policy Means for Marijuana Business Owners: Washington's I-502 and the Federal Controlled Substances Act

GULR (2014/15) 50-3, 305-335.

32 Pages Posted: 14 Apr 2017 Last revised: 7 Aug 2020

See all articles by Kimberly Houser

Kimberly Houser

Ostrom Workshop on Data Management and Information Governance, Indiana University; Digital Democracy Lab, William & Mary Law School

Date Written: February 14, 2015

Abstract

Under current federal law marijuana is still a Schedule I substance which is causing a variety of legal problems for marijuana business owners in states that have recently enacted laws permitting the sale of marijuana for recreational purposes. Because Schedule I labels marijuana as a dangerous addictive drug with no medical uses under federal law, business owners are dealing with numerous challenges relating to banking and taxes in relation to their marijuana dispensaries with the potential threat of federal criminal action. The article first discusses the history of state marijuana laws, Washington State’s policy on marijuana, federal law and enforcement of marijuana laws, and concludes with how federal marijuana policy is impacting businesses in states that have legalized certain uses of marijuana.

Suggested Citation

Houser, Kimberly, What Inconsistent Federal Policy Means for Marijuana Business Owners: Washington's I-502 and the Federal Controlled Substances Act (February 14, 2015). GULR (2014/15) 50-3, 305-335., Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2952402

Kimberly Houser (Contact Author)

Ostrom Workshop on Data Management and Information Governance, Indiana University ( email )

Indiana University
Bloomington Indiana, IN
United States

Digital Democracy Lab, William & Mary Law School

PO Box 8795
William and Mary Law School
Williamsburg, VA 23187
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
50
Abstract Views
655
PlumX Metrics