How Scheduling Can Bias Quality Assessment: Evidence from Food Safety Inspections

66 Pages Posted: 17 Apr 2017 Last revised: 7 Apr 2019

See all articles by Maria Ibanez

Maria Ibanez

Harvard University - Business School (HBS)

Michael W. Toffel

Harvard Business School

Date Written: February 11, 2019

Abstract

Accuracy and consistency are critical for inspections to be an effective, fair, and useful tool for assessing risks, quality, and suppliers — and for making decisions based on those assessments. We examine how inspector schedules could introduce bias that erodes inspection quality by altering inspector stringency. Our analysis of thousands of food safety inspections reveals that inspectors are affected by the inspection outcomes at their prior inspected establishment (outcome effects), citing more violations after they inspect establishments that exhibited worse compliance levels or trends. Moreover, consistent with negativity bias, the effect is stronger after observing compliance deterioration than improvement. Inspection results are also affected by when the inspection occurs within an inspector’s day (daily schedule effects): inspectors cite fewer violations after spending more time conducting inspections throughout the day, and when inspections risk prolonging their typical workday. Overall, our findings suggest that currently unreported violations would be cited if the outcome effects — which increase scrutiny — were triggered more often and if the daily schedule effects — which erode scrutiny — were reduced. For example, our estimates indicate that if outcome effects were doubled and daily schedule effects were fully mitigated, 11% more violations would be detected, enabling remedial actions that could substantially reduce foodborne illnesses and hospitalizations. Understanding and addressing these inspection biases can help managers and policymakers improve not only food safety but also process quality, environmental practices, occupational safety, working conditions, and infrastructure.

Keywords: Quality, Scheduling, Bias, Discretion, Inspection, Behavioral Operations, Empirical, Regulation, Public Health

JEL Classification: D91, I18, M42, M48

Suggested Citation

Ibanez, Maria and Toffel, Michael W., How Scheduling Can Bias Quality Assessment: Evidence from Food Safety Inspections (February 11, 2019). Forthcoming, Management Science; Harvard Business School Technology & Operations Mgt. Unit Working Paper No. 17-090. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2953142 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2953142

Maria Ibanez

Harvard University - Business School (HBS) ( email )

Soldiers Field Road
Morgan 270C
Boston, MA 02163
United States

Michael W. Toffel (Contact Author)

Harvard Business School ( email )

Boston, MA 02163
United States
617.384.8043 (Phone)

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
423
Abstract Views
2,193
rank
70,509
PlumX Metrics