The Limits of Natural Law Originalism

(2018) 93 Notre Dame Law Review Online 115

16 Pages Posted: 19 Apr 2017 Last revised: 27 Apr 2018

See all articles by Mikolaj Barczentewicz

Mikolaj Barczentewicz

University of Surrey; University of Oxford

Date Written: April 19, 2017

Abstract

In “Enduring Originalism,” Jeffrey Pojanowski and Kevin C. Walsh outline how originalism in constitutional interpretation can be grounded in modern natural law theory as developed by John Finnis. Their argument to that effect is powerful and constitutes a welcome addition both to natural law theory and to originalist theory. However, the authors chose to present their account as a superior alternative to, or modification of, “positive” (“original-law”) originalism of Stephen Sachs and William Baude. It is that aspect of the paper that I focus on in this short essay. Contrary to their strong claims in that direction, Professors Pojanowski and Walsh are far from establishing that positive originalism is deficient and that that their version of natural-law-based originalism offers a plausible alternative to positivist originalism. There is also a worry that, despite professing sympathy towards the “positive turn” in originalism, “Enduring Originalism” is at its core an account of what Professors Pojanowski and Walsh think the law should be, and not what the law is; precisely the kind of argument the positive turn militates against.

Keywords: originalism, constitutional interpretation, jurisprudence, legal positivism, natural law

Suggested Citation

Barczentewicz, Mikolaj, The Limits of Natural Law Originalism (April 19, 2017). (2018) 93 Notre Dame Law Review Online 115, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2955184

Mikolaj Barczentewicz (Contact Author)

University of Surrey ( email )

Guildford
Guildford, Surrey GU2 5XH
United Kingdom

University of Oxford ( email )

Mansfield Road
Oxford, Oxfordshire OX1 4AU
United Kingdom

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
180
Abstract Views
1,076
rank
215,848
PlumX Metrics