The Rights-Focused, Interests-Focused Disputant: Empathy Gaps in Disputing Strategy

24 Pages Posted: 19 Apr 2017

See all articles by Brian Gunia

Brian Gunia

Johns Hopkins University - Carey Business School

Erik Helzer

Johns Hopkins University - Carey Business School

Date Written: April 2017

Abstract

Decades of negotiation research suggest that deal-making negotiators and disputants achieve the best outcomes when they focus extensively on interests. However, research on whether and how they can actually do that is much more voluminous for deal-making negotiations than disputes. Integrating research on disputes and empathy gaps, we examine that possibility that disputants (naturally in a “hot state”) may have a distinctly hard time implementing their “cold state” intentions to focus on interests. After validating the importance of an interests focus in disputes, our second study documents the difficulty of implementing interest-focused intentions in disputes. Finally, we describe a third, planned study examining an intervention to help disputants implement their interest-focused intentions. These studies highlight a potential disconnect between disputants’ intentions and behavior, suggesting that disputing research may benefit from a new and unique set of theoretical assumptions.

Suggested Citation

Gunia, Brian and Helzer, Erik, The Rights-Focused, Interests-Focused Disputant: Empathy Gaps in Disputing Strategy (April 2017). Johns Hopkins Carey Business School Research Paper No. 17-03. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2955269 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2955269

Brian Gunia (Contact Author)

Johns Hopkins University - Carey Business School ( email )

100 International Drive
Baltimore, MD 21202
United States

Erik Helzer

Johns Hopkins University - Carey Business School ( email )

100 International Drive
Baltimore, MD 21202
United States

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
17
Abstract Views
210
PlumX Metrics