Overconfidence in Investment Decisions: An Experimental Approach
22 Pages Posted: 25 Jan 2002
Date Written: December 2001
Abstract
We experimentally test overconfidence in investment decisions by offering participants the possibility to substitute their own for alternative investment choices. Overall, 149 subjects participated in two experiments, one with just one risky asset, the other with two risky assets. Overconfidence increases (i) with the absolute deviation from optimal choices, (ii) with task complexity, and (iii) decreases with uncertainty as indicated by the difference between willingness to pay and to accept.
Keywords: Risky Decision Making, Behavioral Finance, Portfolio Choice, Experimental Economics
JEL Classification: C91, D81, G11
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Strong Evidence for Gender Differences in Investment
By Gary Charness and Uri Gneezy
-
Portfolio Choice and Risk Attitudes: An Experiment
By Gary Charness and Uri Gneezy
-
Myopic Loss Aversion: Information Feedback vs. Investment Flexibility
By Charles Bellemare, Michael U. Krause, ...
-
Does Binding of Feedback Influence Myopic Loss Aversion? An Experimental Analysis
By Martin Weber and Thomas Langer
-
A Domain-Specific Risk-Taking (DOSPERT) Scale for Adult Populations
By Ann-renee Blais and Elke U. Weber
-
Impatience and Uncertainty: Experimental Decisions Predict Adolescents' Field Behavior
By Matthias Sutter, Martin G. Kocher, ...
-
Negative Recency, Randomization Device Choice, and Reduction of Compound Lotteries
By Kim Kaivanto and Eike B. Kroll