Brief of Professors of Patent Law and Civil Procedure as Amici Curiae in Support of Respondent in TC Heartland LLC v. Kraft Food Prods. Group

19 Pages Posted: 4 May 2017  

Megan M. La Belle

Catholic University of America (CUA) - Columbus School of Law

Rachel Hughey

Independent

Date Written: March 8, 2017

Abstract

Over the past decade, the Supreme Court has frequently reversed the Federal Circuit for adopting procedural rules for patent cases that differed from those that apply in other federal cases. TC Heartland v. Kraft Foods likewise concerns the Federal Circuit’s approach to a procedural issue in patent cases, namely, venue. However, unlike in the prior cases before the Court, the Federal Circuit is not an outlier on this issue. Rather, the Federal Circuit’s interpretation of the venue statute is consistent with the statute’s plain language and with broader historical trends in venue law. While the petitioner and amici in support of petitioner raise important policy questions about forum choice in patent cases, Congressional legislation or alterations to personal jurisdiction doctrine by this Court are more appropriate avenues of reform.

Suggested Citation

La Belle, Megan M. and Hughey, Rachel, Brief of Professors of Patent Law and Civil Procedure as Amici Curiae in Support of Respondent in TC Heartland LLC v. Kraft Food Prods. Group (March 8, 2017). CUA Columbus School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2018-5. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2963248 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2963248

Megan Maureen La Belle (Contact Author)

Catholic University of America (CUA) - Columbus School of Law ( email )

3600 John McCormack Rd., NE
Washington, DC 20064
United States

Rachel Hughey

Independent ( email )

No Address Available

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
20
Abstract Views
158
PlumX