Protecting Inland Waterways: From the Institutes of Gaius to Magna Carta

10 Unbound: A Review of Legal History and Rare Books 1, 2018

25 Pages Posted: 16 May 2017 Last revised: 28 Dec 2020

Date Written: April 18, 2017

Abstract

No single factor has had a more significant effect on the ebbs and flows of history than water. Water creates civilizations, and water brings them to extinction. Even today, thousands of years after we learned to harness the power of water, we continue to struggle in determining how to prioritize competing uses of water resources, how to make water available to all who need it, and how to protect it. Yet, these are questions that humans have faced since as long as history dares to recollect.

What factors guide civilizations in their decision whether, and to what extent, to regulate and protect inland waterways? This article looks at four legal codes from three distinct civilizations: From the Romans, The Institutes of Gaius and the Corpus Juris Civilis; from the Visigoth Kingdom, the Visigothic Code; and from the English, Magna Carta. This article proposes that, perhaps more so than inherited Roman tradition, two sets of factors influenced the extent to which these codes protected inland waterways: perceptions of water resource abundance and the propensity for navigability and trade of these civilizations’ inland waterways.

Keywords: water law, natural resources, water management, environmental law, rome, visigoth, england, gaius, corpus juris civilis, visigothic code, magna carta, waterways

JEL Classification: Q25, Q53, R10

Suggested Citation

Rodriguez, Gonzalo, Protecting Inland Waterways: From the Institutes of Gaius to Magna Carta (April 18, 2017). 10 Unbound: A Review of Legal History and Rare Books 1, 2018, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2968145

Gonzalo Rodriguez (Contact Author)

Natural Resources Defense Council ( email )

111 Sutter St
Fl. 21
San Francisco, CA 94104
United States

HOME PAGE: http://https://www.nrdc.org/experts/gonzalo-e-rodriguez

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
77
Abstract Views
710
Rank
390,153
PlumX Metrics