Proportional Mens Rea and the Future of Criminal Code Reform

29 Pages Posted: 15 May 2017 Last revised: 8 Aug 2018

See all articles by Michael Serota

Michael Serota

Arizona State University, Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law; Academy for Justice

Date Written: December 20, 2017

Abstract

This Article argues that the principle of proportional mens rea — roughly, the idea that more blameworthy states of mind should be punished more severely, while less blameworthy states of mind should be punished more leniently — is central to the administration of justice, yet has largely been ignored by American criminal justice policies. I contend that this oversight provides a key justification and source of guidance for future criminal code reform efforts, while explaining how a criminal code reform agenda premised on the principle of proportional mens rea might be realized as a matter of course. The Article is comprised of three parts. Part I sets forth the theory of proportional mens rea and criminal legislation animating this Article. Part II highlights the extent to which American criminal codes, as well as American sentencing policies more generally, fail to live up to this normative benchmark. Part III then concludes with a discussion of the two main models of criminal code reform, what I respectively refer to as the thick model and the thin model, through which efforts to better align criminal codes with the principle of proportional mens rea might proceed.

Suggested Citation

Serota, Michael Eli, Proportional Mens Rea and the Future of Criminal Code Reform (December 20, 2017). 52 Wake Forest Law Review 1201 (2017). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2968395

Michael Eli Serota (Contact Author)

Arizona State University, Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law ( email )

Box 877906
Tempe, AZ
United States

Academy for Justice ( email )

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
137
Abstract Views
569
rank
210,304
PlumX Metrics