10 Pages Posted: 18 May 2017 Last revised: 22 May 2017
Date Written: May 1, 2017
This note offers an initial response to a study released earlier this month by Martijn Cremers and Simone Sepe, “Board Declassification Activism: The Financial Value of the Shareholder Rights Project.” Putting aside methodological questions about their analysis and accepting their results “as is,” we show that the results of this study do not provide a basis for opposing board declassifications. Appropriately interpreted, the results provide some significant evidence that declassifications are beneficial and no evidence that they are value-reducing. The results obtained for preceding years in prior published work by the authors either do not hold or are substantially reversed in the period examined by the current study. Overall, the results of the current study contradict and undermine the conclusions in the authors’ earlier published work in support of staggered boards.
JEL Classification: G32, G34, K22
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Bebchuk, Lucian A. and Cohen, Alma, Recent Board Declassifications: A Response to Cremers and Sepe (May 1, 2017). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2970629 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2970629