Mr. Nicolson's Cane

51 Pages Posted: 19 May 2017 Last revised: 25 May 2017

See all articles by Mark D. Janis

Mark D. Janis

Indiana University Maurer School of Law

Date Written: 2017


One of the most widely-recognized artifacts in American patent law iconography is also among its most peculiar: Samuel Nicolson’s cane. The cane played a leading role in the Court’s analysis in American Nicholson v. City of Elizabeth, a nineteenth-century decision that has become a fixture in the patent law canon. The case is the leading enunciation of the doctrine of experimental use, which spares inventors from forfeiting patent rights when they can show that otherwise disqualifying sales or uses were undertaken as experiments to perfect their inventions. This paper argues that the modern experimental use doctrine needs to rediscover its roots. It first shows that the modern doctrine has become a victim of a shift towards formalist analysis. It then tells the story of the City of Elizabeth case, demonstrating that the experimental use doctrine at its outset was an essentially instrumental doctrine serving as a discretionary hedge against patent forfeiture. The paper concludes that restoring this character to the experimental use doctrine will best serve the objectives of the current patent system, and provides lessons for approaching patentability law as it will develop under the newly-implemented America Invents Act.

Keywords: Validity, Prior art, statutory bar, Section 102, public use, experimental use

Suggested Citation

Janis, Mark David, Mr. Nicolson's Cane (2017). Arizona Law Review, Vol. 59, Forthcoming; Indiana Legal Studies Research Paper No. 374. Available at SSRN:

Mark David Janis (Contact Author)

Indiana University Maurer School of Law ( email )

211 S. Indiana Avenue
Bloomington, IN 47405
United States

Register to save articles to
your library


Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics