Signs of the Times: Dale V. Boy Scouts of America and the Changing Meaning of Nondiscrimination

22 Pages Posted: 16 Jan 2002 Last revised: 10 May 2009

Abstract

All antidiscrimination laws are unconstitutional in all their applications. Citizens are allowed to disobey laws whenever obedience would be perceived as endorsing some message. Both of these propositions are absurd. However, the Supreme Court's opinion in Dale v. Boy Scouts of America stands for at least one of them, and perhaps both. The already voluminous commentary on Dale is too polite, because almost all of it fails to notice the sheer lunacy of what the Court said. The Court's disastrous opinion offers a useful cautionary lesson in First Amendment jurisprudence: determinations of what is protected speech cannot defer either to individual speakers or to the culture as a whole, because such deference produces bizarre results.

Suggested Citation

Koppelman, Andrew M., Signs of the Times: Dale V. Boy Scouts of America and the Changing Meaning of Nondiscrimination. Cardozo Law Review, Vol. 23, 2002; Northwestern Public Law Research Paper No. 02-02. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=297180 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.297180

Andrew M. Koppelman (Contact Author)

Northwestern University School of Law ( email )

375 E. Chicago Ave
Chicago, IL 60611
United States
312-503-8431 (Phone)

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
448
Abstract Views
3,202
rank
63,964
PlumX Metrics