Constituencies and Legislation: The Fight Over the Mcfadden Act of 1927

47 Pages Posted: 2 Jun 2017

See all articles by Rodney Ramcharan

Rodney Ramcharan

University of Southern California, Marshall School of Business

Rajan Raghuram

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Date Written: 2012

Abstract

The McFadden Act of 1927 was one of the most hotly contested pieces of legislation in U.S. banking history, and its influence was still felt over half a century later. The act was intended to force states to accord the same branching rights to national banks as they accorded to state banks. By uniting the interests of large state and national banks, it also had the potential to expand the number of states that allowed branching. Congressional votes for the act therefore could reflect the strength of various interests in the district for expanded banking competition. We find congressmen in districts in which landholdings were concentrated (suggesting a landed elite), and where the cost of bank credit was high and its availability limited (suggesting limited banking competition and high potential rents), were significantly more likely to oppose the act. The evidence suggests that while the law and the overall regulatory structure can shape the financial system far into the future, they themselves are likely to be shaped by well organized elites, even in countries with benign political institutions.

Suggested Citation

Ramcharan, Rodney and Raghuram, Rajan, Constituencies and Legislation: The Fight Over the Mcfadden Act of 1927 (2012). FEDS Working Paper No. 2012-61. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2976672

Rodney Ramcharan (Contact Author)

University of Southern California, Marshall School of Business ( email )

2250 Alcazar Street
Los Angeles, CA 90089
United States

HOME PAGE: http://https://sites.google.com/site/rodneyramcharan/

Rajan Raghuram

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
14
Abstract Views
108
PlumX Metrics