The Appointments Clause, Innovative Federalism, and the Constitutionality of the Northwest Power Planning Council

8 Journal of Energy Law and Policy 1 (1987)

26 Pages Posted: 2 Jun 2017

Date Written: March 1, 1987

Abstract

This paper, written shortly after the Ninth Circuit upheld the constitutionality of the Northwest Planning Council, which Congress authorized to implement the Northwest Power Act, analyzed the court's decision. The paper reviewed the unsuccessful attempts to challenge the Council (thereby undermining its power planning and fish and wildlife programs) as violating the compact and appointments clauses of the Constitution as well as several alleged statutory infirmities. The paper concluded that the Ninth Circuit's decision was entirely consistent with the Supreme Court's then-recent decision in Bowsher v. Synar, which upheld the 1985 Balanced Budget Act (popularly known as Graham-Rudman-Hollings Act).

Keywords: Separation of Powers, Appointments Clause, Compacts, Federalism, Fish and Wildlife, Energy

JEL Classification: K19, K23, K32, Q01, Q22, Q25, Q28

Suggested Citation

Blumm, Michael C., The Appointments Clause, Innovative Federalism, and the Constitutionality of the Northwest Power Planning Council (March 1, 1987). 8 Journal of Energy Law and Policy 1 (1987). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2978488

Michael C. Blumm (Contact Author)

Lewis & Clark Law School ( email )

10015 S.W. Terwilliger Blvd.
Portland, OR 97219
United States
503-768-6824 (Phone)
503-768-6701 (Fax)

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
9
Abstract Views
150
PlumX Metrics