Download this Paper Open PDF in Browser

Equal Moral Membership: Naz Foundation and the Refashioning of Equality

39 Pages Posted: 7 Jun 2017  

Gautam Bhatia

Yale University - Law School

Date Written: June 5, 2017

Abstract

The judgment of the Delhi High Court in Naz Foundation vs NCT of Delhi (2009), which effectively decriminalised homosexuality in India by "reading down" Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code (the "anti-sodomy law") has been celebrated for its progressive outcome. This paper argues that Naz Foundation was an important judgment not only for its impact on the LGBT community, but because of its reasoning, which sought to profoundly reshape Indian constitutional equality jurisprudence, and bring it in line with the Indian Constitution's transformative character. Reconstructing the judgment by reading it alongside the written submissions and the arguments advanced by the parties, this essay argues that at the heart of Naz Foundation was the understanding that situations of complex inequality were ill-served by the traditional "reasonable classification" test; rather, Indian equality jurisprudence required the fashioning of a legal test that read together "equal protection" and "non-discrimination", and shifted the focus from classification to disadvantage and exclusion. Although Naz Foundation was subsequently reversed by the Supreme Court, its reasoning remains of great importance in the trajectory of Indian equality jurisprudence, and of transformative constitutionalism.

Keywords: Equality, Discrimination, Sodomy, LGBT Rights

Suggested Citation

Bhatia, Gautam, Equal Moral Membership: Naz Foundation and the Refashioning of Equality (June 5, 2017). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2980862 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2980862

Gautam Bhatia (Contact Author)

Yale University - Law School ( email )

P.O. Box 208215
New Haven, CT 06520-8215
United States

Paper statistics

Downloads
115
Rank
206,586
Abstract Views
595