Legal Argumentation and the Rule of Law

This article has been published as 'The Rule of Dual-Natured Law' in Legal Argumentation and the Rule of Law, edited by Eveline Feteris, Harm Kloosterhuis, José Plug, and Carel Smith, 27–46. 2016. The Hague: Eleven International Publishing.

14 Pages Posted: 12 Jun 2017

See all articles by Matthias Klatt

Matthias Klatt

University of Graz - Faculty of Law

Date Written: 2016

Abstract

Both the concept of legal argumentation and the concept of the rule of law are contested and subject to irrationality objections. The present article refutes these objections by analysing the two concepts and focussing on their mutual relation. Based on a new account of the rule of dual-natured law, it elaborates in detail on how law’s dual nature play out in the various forms and problems of legal reasoning, allowing for a third theory of legal argumentation which integrates formal and material elements by means of optimization.

Keywords: balancing, concept of law, dual-nature thesis, further development of the law, interpretation, irrationality objection, legal argumentation, principle of legality, proportionality, rule of law

Suggested Citation

Klatt, Matthias, Legal Argumentation and the Rule of Law (2016). This article has been published as 'The Rule of Dual-Natured Law' in Legal Argumentation and the Rule of Law, edited by Eveline Feteris, Harm Kloosterhuis, José Plug, and Carel Smith, 27–46. 2016. The Hague: Eleven International Publishing.. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2984342

Matthias Klatt (Contact Author)

University of Graz - Faculty of Law ( email )

Universitätspl. 3
Graz, Styria 8010
Austria

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
127
Abstract Views
376
rank
228,186
PlumX Metrics