A Difference that Makes a Difference? Reflexivity and Researcher Effects in an All-Foreign Prison

International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16 (1), 1-10.

10 Pages Posted: 14 Jun 2017

Date Written: June 13, 2017

Abstract

Today, researchers are expected to spend considerable energy describing and discussing their own social positions and personas in the field for at least two reasons: First, researchers always observe the field from a specific point of view. Their perspective is structured by their own social position and biography and is thus unique. Second, the people in the field react differently to the presence of different researchers. The field persona of the researcher is expected to impact the data she or he is able to produce. For these reasons, critically discussing one’s own field experiences is seen as an important part of the qualitative research process. This article will discuss the second part of this argument. Based on the experiences of two different researchers in the same field site, we ask whether it is true that different researchers necessarily produce different data. We conclude that in this case, at least, the differences between the two researchers did not seem to make much of a difference.

Keywords: reflexivity, researcher field persona, researcher effects, self-positioning, prison ethnography

Suggested Citation

Damsa, Dorina and Ugelvik, Thomas, A Difference that Makes a Difference? Reflexivity and Researcher Effects in an All-Foreign Prison (June 13, 2017). International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16 (1), 1-10., Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2985411

Dorina Damsa

University of Oslo ( email )

PO Box 6706 St Olavs plass
Oslo, N-0317
Norway

Thomas Ugelvik (Contact Author)

University of Oslo ( email )

PO Box 6706 St Olavs plass
Oslo, N-0317
Norway

HOME PAGE: http://www.jus.uio.no/ikrs/personer/vit/thomawis/index.html

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
26
Abstract Views
369
PlumX Metrics