Assessing the Role of Resolutions in the ILC Draft Conclusions on Identification of Customary International Law: Substantive and Methodological Issues

24 Pages Posted: 16 Jun 2017

Multiple version iconThere are 2 versions of this paper

Date Written: June 16, 2017

Abstract

On 30 May 2016, the International Law Commission (ILC) adopted a set of 16 draft Conclusions providing a methodology on how to identify customary international law. Although largely based on the two elements approach set forth in Article 38(1)(b) of the ICJ Statute, the ILC study pushes the boundaries of the formal sources of international law beyond the realm of state practice by recognizing that the practice of international organizations (IOs) as such may be constitutive of custom. This article critically examines the ILC draft Conclusions concerning the role of IOs in the process of custom creation. It examines the concept of resolution adopted by the ILC and assesses the coherence of the interpretive methodology devised by the ILC using the UN General Assembly resolutions as a case study. The findings show that the draft Conclusions fall short of expectation in providing authoritative guidance to scholars and practitioners alike.

Keywords: Customary International Law, ILC, Article 38 ICJ, International Court of Justice, International Organizations, United Nations, UN General Assembly

Suggested Citation

Deplano, Rossana, Assessing the Role of Resolutions in the ILC Draft Conclusions on Identification of Customary International Law: Substantive and Methodological Issues (June 16, 2017). University of Leicester School of Law Research Paper No. 17-05. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2987931

Rossana Deplano (Contact Author)

Leicester Law School ( email )

University Road
Leicester LE1 7RH, LE1 7RH
United Kingdom

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
77
rank
120,850
Abstract Views
454
PlumX Metrics