Originalism Without Text

13 Pages Posted: 19 Jun 2017 Last revised: 27 Oct 2017

Date Written: June 17, 2017

Abstract

Originalism is not about the text. Though the theory is often treated as a way to read the Constitution's words, that conventional view is misleading. A society can be recognizably originalist without any words to interpret: without a written constitution, written statutes, or any writing at all. If texts aren't fundamental to originalism, then originalism isn't fundamentally about texts. Avoiding that error helps us see what originalism generally *is* about: namely, our present constitutional law, and its dependence on a crucial moment in the past.

Keywords: originalism, text, original meaning, original law, constitution, interpretation, unwritten law

JEL Classification: K10

Suggested Citation

Sachs, Stephen E., Originalism Without Text (June 17, 2017). Yale Law Journal, vol. 127, pp. 156-168 (2017), Duke Law School Public Law & Legal Theory Series No. 2017-46, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2988019

Stephen E. Sachs (Contact Author)

Harvard Law School ( email )

1563 Massachusetts Avenue
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States
617-495-5009 (Phone)

HOME PAGE: http://https://hls.harvard.edu/faculty/directory/11417/Sachs

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
644
Abstract Views
2,400
rank
51,417
PlumX Metrics