Negotiated Transfer Pricing: Is Fairness Easier Said than Done?

Posted: 21 Mar 2002

Abstract

Questionnaire responses reported by Luft and Libby (1997) reveal that transfer price negotiators expect fairness-based price concessions that moderate the influence of an outside market price when the outside market price strongly favors one of the parties. We examine whether these expectations of fairness extend to the actual prices that result from real-cash negotiations. Findings indicate that expectations of fairness-based price concessions do not survive actual negotiations when participants negotiate over a computer network with no communication other than bids, asks, and acceptances. Conversely, both expectations and actual negotiated outcomes reflect fairness-based price concessions when participants negotiate in a face-to-face setting with unrestricted communication. Together, these results imply that the extent to which questionnaire-based judgments of social behavior generalize to actual behavior depends on the whether the competitive environment suppresses or reinforces the social presence necessary to sustain phenomena such as preferences for fairness.

Keywords: Transfer pricing; Fairness; Negotiation

JEL Classification: M40, M46

Suggested Citation

Kachelmeier, Steven J. and Towry, Kristy L., Negotiated Transfer Pricing: Is Fairness Easier Said than Done?. Accounting Review, Vol. 77, No. 3, July 2002, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=298864

Steven J. Kachelmeier (Contact Author)

University of Texas at Austin ( email )

Department of Accounting
2110 Speedway, Mail Stop B6400
Austin, TX 78712
United States
512-471-3517 (Phone)
512-471-3904 (Fax)

Kristy L. Towry

Emory University ( email )

Goizueta Business School
1300 Clifton Road
Atlanta, GA 30322
United States
404-727-4895 (Phone)

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
3,556
PlumX Metrics