Entry and Asymmetric Lobbying: Why Governments Pick Losers
25 Pages Posted: 2 Feb 2002 Last revised: 5 Dec 2022
There are 2 versions of this paper
Entry and Asymmetric Lobbying: Why Governments Pick Losers
Entry and Asymmetric Lobbying: Why Governments Pick Losers
Date Written: January 2002
Abstract
Governments frequently intervene to support domestic industries, but a surprising amount of this support goes to ailing sectors. We explain this with a lobbying model that allows for entry and sunk costs. Specifically, policy is influenced by pressure groups that incur lobbying expenses to create rents. In expanding industry, entry tends to erode such rents, but in declining industries, sunk costs rule out entry as long as the rents are not too high. This asymmetric appropriablity of rents means losers lobby harder. Thus it is not that government policy picks losers, it is that losers pick government policy.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Major Trade Trends in East Asia: What are Their Implications for Regional Cooperation and Growth?
By Francis Ng and Alexander J. Yeats
-
Multilateralising Regionalism: Spaghetti Bowls as Building Blocs on the Path to Global Free Trade
-
Multilateralising Regionalism: Spaghetti Bowls as Building Blocs on the Path to Global Free Trade
-
The Political Economy of Declining Industries: Senescent Industry Collapse Revisited
By S. Lael Brainard and Thierry Verdier
-
Managing the Noodle Bowl: The Fragility of East Asian Regionalism
-
The Formation of International Production and Distribution Networks in East Asia
By Mitsuyo Ando and Fukunari Kimura
-
Beyond the WTO? An Anatomy of EU and US Preferential Trade Agreements
By Henrik Horn, Petros C. Mavroidis, ...