Defense Counsel and Public Defense

Defense Counsel and Public Defense, in Academy for Justice, A Report on Scholarship and Criminal Justice Reform (Erik Luna ed., 2017 Forthcoming)

19 Pages Posted: 27 Jun 2017 Last revised: 11 Jul 2017

Date Written: June 23, 2017

Abstract

Public defense delivery systems nationwide are grossly inadequate. Public defenders are forced to handle caseloads that no one could effectively manage. They often have no funding for investigation or expert assistance. They aren’t adequately trained, and there is little-to-no oversight of their work. In many jurisdictions, the public defense function is not sufficiently independent of the judiciary or the elected branches to allow for zealous representation. The result is an assembly line into prison, mostly for poor people of color, with little check on the reliability or fairness of the process. Innocent people are convicted, precious resources are wasted, and the legitimacy of the entire criminal justice system is undermined. This chapter suggests that effective reform is possible if policymakers address how public defense delivery systems are structured, whether they are independent, the sources and amount of funding allocated to public defense, and the adequacy of training and oversight mechanisms.

Keywords: right to counsel

Suggested Citation

Primus, Eve Brensike, Defense Counsel and Public Defense (June 23, 2017). Defense Counsel and Public Defense, in Academy for Justice, A Report on Scholarship and Criminal Justice Reform (Erik Luna ed., 2017 Forthcoming). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2991845

Eve Brensike Primus (Contact Author)

University of Michigan Law School ( email )

625 South State Street
Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1215
United States

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
171
rank
170,952
Abstract Views
590
PlumX Metrics