Impression Products, Inc. v. Lexmark International, Inc.: A Glib Rebuke of the Federal Circuit

George Washington Law Review On the Docket, June 2017

5 Pages Posted: 26 Jun 2017 Last revised: 18 Jun 2018

Date Written: June 11, 2017

Abstract

While the result of the Supreme Court's decision in Impression Products is defensible, the opinion's lack of sophistication makes the case seem easier than it was, unnecessarily sowing the seeds of potential future confusion.

Keywords: patent exhaustion

Suggested Citation

Michaels, Andrew C., Impression Products, Inc. v. Lexmark International, Inc.: A Glib Rebuke of the Federal Circuit (June 11, 2017). George Washington Law Review On the Docket, June 2017, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2992391 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2992391

Andrew C. Michaels (Contact Author)

University of Houston Law Center ( email )

4604 Calhoun Road
Houston, TX 77204-6060
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
61
Abstract Views
471
rank
428,191
PlumX Metrics