The Equal Employment Opportunity Omission

26 Pages Posted: 29 Jun 2017

See all articles by William Lazonick

William Lazonick

The Academic-Industry Research Network

Philip Moss

University of Massachusetts Lowell

Joshua Weitz

The Academic-Industry Research Network

Date Written: December 5, 2016

Abstract

On June 2, 1965, under a mandate established by Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the U.S. Congress created the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) to enforce federal anti-discrimination laws related to employment. The expectation was that African Americans would be prime beneficiaries of the EEOC. There was no assumption that the EEOC, on its own, could reverse deep-rooted employment discrimination against blacks. But in the late 1960s there was optimism that, in combination with equal educational opportunity and the strong demand for unionized workers in the well-paid manufacturing jobs that marked the post-World War II decades, the EEOC could help to ensure that an ever-increasing number of blacks would ascend to the American middle class.

African Americans as a group are better educated than they were in the 1960s, and, as discriminatory norms and practices have lessened, large numbers of college-educated blacks have experienced upward employment mobility into professional, technical, and administrative occupations. But the promise of a large-scale ascendancy of blacks to middle-class status, characterized by secure and well-paid employment, has not been fulfilled. Our basic thesis is that, in combination with the institutions of racism which remain widespread in American society, the erosion of secure and well-paid employment opportunities is a major reason for the persistence since the 1980s of African Americans as disproportionately disadvantaged. Our contribution to the larger debate on the economics of race is to focus on the role of corporate resource allocation as the prime determinant of the quantity and quality of employment opportunities in the economy. The decline of middle-class employment opportunities has adversely affected the majority of the U.S. labor force of all races, ethnicities, and genders. African Americans, however, have been more vulnerable than other demographic groups to this decline.

U.S. institutions of corporate governance vest power over major resource-allocation decisions in the hands of senior executives, supported by their hand-picked corporate boards. Given the enormous size of the major business corporations and their centrality to economic activity, the resource-allocation decisions made by senior executives of major U.S. corporations profoundly influence the operation and performance of the economy as a whole—including the availability, or not, of secure and well-paid employment opportunities. The failure to include an analysis of corporate resource allocation and how it has changed over the past half century in the policy debate on income inequality is what we call the “equal employment opportunity omission.”

Keywords: employment opportunity, employment relations, blue-collar workers, white- collar workers, corporate governance, financialization, racial discrimination, African Americans, middle class, intergenerational economic mobility

JEL Classification: J5, J6, J7, J8, M5

Suggested Citation

Lazonick, William and Moss, Philip and Weitz, Joshua, The Equal Employment Opportunity Omission (December 5, 2016). Institute for New Economic Thinking Working Paper Series No. 53, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2993928 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2993928

William Lazonick (Contact Author)

The Academic-Industry Research Network ( email )

12 Newport Road
Porter Square
Cambridge, MA 02140
United States

Philip Moss

University of Massachusetts Lowell ( email )

1 University Ave
Lowell, MA 01854
United States

Joshua Weitz

The Academic-Industry Research Network ( email )

12 Newport Road
Porter Square
Cambridge, MA 02140
United States

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
56
Abstract Views
898
rank
401,415
PlumX Metrics