Download this Paper Open PDF in Browser

Harassment Trainings: A Content Analysis

48 Pages Posted: 29 Jun 2017 Last revised: 19 Oct 2017

Elizabeth Chika Tippett

University of Oregon School of Law

Date Written: October 17, 2017

Abstract

Harassment training programs are ubiquitous, yet researchers have not systematically examined their content or how they have changed over time. This study begins to fill that gap through a content analysis of 74 current and historical harassment trainings spanning a period of 1980 to 2016. Results suggest that trainings are heavily influenced by early content developed in the 1980s and early 1990s. Changes in training content over time are like software updates, periodically adding new features without fundamentally altering the nature of the training. Consequently, contemporary trainings include large quantities of tangential legal information and overemphasize sexual conduct at the expense of other forms of harassment. They also tend to suggest that relatively trivial slights could give rise to harassment-related liability. Overall, trainings tend to gloss over the discrimination-based origins and purpose of harassment law, which might otherwise serve as a moral anchor for the trainings. I discuss the costs and benefits of this approach, and offer some ideas for future directions in training.

Keywords: harassment, trainings, Title VII, discrimination, compliance, sexual harassment

Suggested Citation

Tippett, Elizabeth Chika, Harassment Trainings: A Content Analysis (October 17, 2017). Berkeley Journal of Employment and Labor Law, 2018. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2994571

Elizabeth Tippett (Contact Author)

University of Oregon School of Law ( email )

1515 Agate Street
Eugene, OR Oregon 97403
United States
541-346-8938 (Phone)

Paper statistics

Downloads
126
Rank
210,801
Abstract Views
656