State Consent and ‘Official Acts’: Clearing the Muddied Waters of Immunity Ratione Materiae for International Crimes

47 Pages Posted: 3 Jul 2017 Last revised: 12 Jun 2019

See all articles by Liam Elphick

Liam Elphick

The University of Western Australia Law School; Melbourne Law School; La Trobe Law School; Berkeley Center on Comparative Equality and Anti-Discrimination Law

Date Written: 2016

Abstract

Jurisdictional immunities – and particularly immunity ratione materiae – have stifled the ability of municipal courts to hold individual officials accountable for their actions under international human rights and international criminal law. This has resulted in significant confusion surrounding the status of immunity ratione materiae in cases where international crimes are alleged against State officials, as the very acts that would likely comprise international crimes – ‘official’ State sanctioned acts – are those which are protected by the immunity. Whilst there is a growing body of judicial decisions, national legislation, international guidance and scholarly commentary on this issue, its complexities remain unresolved. This has led to a period of stasis in the area of international law immunities. This article seeks to contribute to the literature by providing greater clarity on these matters and in particular when an official might be held individually accountable for breaches of international criminal law. It is argued that, premised largely upon State consent, immunity ratione materiae should subside in cases of international crimes. It will be contended that State consent is implied from a combination of widespread ratification of the Rome Statute, State contributions made towards the development of international criminal law, and a global shift towards accountability and justice and away from impunity. As such, a change to the definition of ‘official acts’, which attract functional immunity, is proposed to reflect this. While such arguments may appear counter intuitive to pre-existing notions of State responsibility for certain international wrongs, and the inherent State sanctioned nature of international crimes, it will be concluded that States and individuals can and should both be equally responsible for the perpetration of such crimes.

Keywords: jurisdictional immunity, immunity ration material, international human rights law, international criminal law

JEL Classification: K33

Suggested Citation

Elphick, Liam, State Consent and ‘Official Acts’: Clearing the Muddied Waters of Immunity Ratione Materiae for International Crimes (2016). 41(1) University of Western Australia Law Review 275, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2995273

Liam Elphick (Contact Author)

The University of Western Australia Law School ( email )

M253
35 Stirling Highway
Crawley, Western Australia 6009
Australia

HOME PAGE: http://https://research-repository.uwa.edu.au/en/persons/liam-elphick

Melbourne Law School ( email )

185 Pelham Street
Melbourne, VIC 3010
Australia

HOME PAGE: http://https://law.unimelb.edu.au/students/grd/students/liam-elphick

La Trobe Law School ( email )

La Trobe University
Bundoora, VIC 3083 3142
Australia

HOME PAGE: http://https://scholars.latrobe.edu.au/display/lelphick

Berkeley Center on Comparative Equality and Anti-Discrimination Law

Boalt Hall
Berkeley, CA 94720-7200
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
56
Abstract Views
567
Rank
786,771
PlumX Metrics