Does Geographical Agglomeration Foster Economic Growth? And Who Gains and Looses from it?
46 Pages Posted: 8 Feb 2002
Date Written: January 2002
Abstract
This Paper proposes a two-region model of endogenous growth, which is a natural combination of a core-periphery model a la Krugman and of a model of endogenous growth a la Grossman/Helpman/Romer. Specifically, we add to the core-periphery model an R&D sector that uses skilled labour to create new varieties for the modern sector, while forward-looking migration behaviour is introduced. The innovation activity in the R&D sector involves knowledge externalities among skilled workers. Our analysis suggests that the presence of such a sector reinforces the tendency toward agglomeration, and supports the idea that the additional growth spurred by agglomeration may lead to a Pareto-dominant outcome such that when the economy moves from dispersion to agglomeration, innovation follows a much faster pace. As a consequence, even those who stay put in the periphery are better off than under dispersion, provided that the growth effect triggered by the agglomeration is strong enough.
Keywords: Agglomeration, regional growth, endogenous growth, patent
JEL Classification: F12, O40, R11
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Global Income Divergence, Trade and Industrialization: The Geography of Growth Take-Offs
-
Global Income Divergence, Trade and Industrialization: The Geography of Growth Take-Offs
-
Incremental Trade and Endogenous Growth: A Q-Theory Approach
By Richard E. Baldwin and Rikard Forslid
-
Trade Liberalization and Endogenous Growth: A Q-Theory Approach
By Richard E. Baldwin and Rikard Forslid
-
The Core-Periphery Model and Endogenous Growth: Stabilising and De-Stabilising Integration
By Richard E. Baldwin and Rikard Forslid
-
Spatial Agglomeration Dynamics
By Danny Quah
-
Globalization and the Evolution of the Supply Chain: Who Gains and Who Loses?