Transfer Fee Regulations in European Football
28 Pages Posted: 8 Feb 2002
Date Written: February 2002
Abstract
We analyze the impact of three different transfer fee systems on payoffs, contract lengths, training and effort incentives in European football. The different regimes, being used until 1995 (Pre-Bosman; or P), currently in use (Bosman; or B), and recently approved (Monti; or M) differ with respect to the transfer fee an initial club must accept in case of a transfer depending on whether a player has a valid contract or not. We show that the different systems differ only with respect to the contract length if the contract which maximizes the expected joint surplus of the initial club and the player is feasible under each system. Otherwise, regime P is strictly dominated by regime B in terms of expected social welfare. Regime M leads to higher effort but lower incentives to invest in training compared to system B.provide little support for the recent legislative changes.
Keywords: Labor Contracts, Bosman Judgement, Transfer Fees, Breach of Contract, Investment Incentives, General Skills, Externalities
JEL Classification: J41, K12, L83
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Transfer Fee Regulations and Player Development
By Marko Terviö
-
Rottenberg and the Economics of Sport after 50 Years: An Evaluation
-
Legal Restrictions on Buyout Fees: Theory and Evidence from German Soccer
By Eberhard Feess, Bernd Frick, ...
-
Does the Mobility of Football Players Influence the Success of the National Team?
By Dirk G. Baur and Sibylle Lehmann
-
Free Agency and Employment Transitions in Professional Football
By John Goddard and John O. S. Wilson
-
Testing Out Contractual Incompleteness: Evidence from Soccer