Posted: 7 Jul 2017
Date Written: July 5, 2017
We use a unique loan-level dataset to compare portfolio and securitized commercial real estate loans. The paper documents how the types of loans banks choose to hold in their portfolios differ substantially from the types of loans the same banks securitize. Banks tend to hold loans that are "non-standard" in some observable dimension. These loans are riskier and more likely to become dlinquent or distressed. Conditional on default, we find that banks are significantly more likely to extend portfolio loans than is the case for securitized loans. Our results suggest that banks have a comparative advantage in funding risky assets with contracts that may require flexibility in the event of distress.
Keywords: Securitization; CMBS; Commercial banks; Asymmetric information
JEL Classification: G14, G21, D82, G33
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Black, Lamont K. and Krainer, John and Nichols, Joseph, From Origination to Renegotiation: A Comparison of Portfolio and Securitized Commercial Real Estate Loans (July 5, 2017). Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Vol. 55, No. 1, 2017. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2997659