What Difference Does ADR Make? Comparison of ADR and Trial Outcomes in Small Claims Court

This study compares the experience of small claims litigants who use alternative dispute resolution (“ADR”) to those who proceeded to trial without ADR. ADR had significant immediate and long-term benefits, including improved party attitudes toward and relationship with each other, greater sense of empowerment and voice, increases in parties taking responsibility for the dispute, and increases in party satisfaction with the judiciary. Cases that settled in ADR also were less likely to return to court for an enforcement action within the next year.

Keywords: ADR, empirical, Maryland courts, negotiated agreements, settlements, small claims court

Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation

Charkoudian, Lorig and Eisenberg, Deborah Thompson and Walter, Jamie, What Difference Does ADR Make? Comparison of ADR and Trial Outcomes in Small Claims Court (July 7, 2017). 34 Conflict Resolution Quarterly (2017)., U of Maryland Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2017-17, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2998784