Abstract

https://ssrn.com/abstract=299980
 


 



The Permanence of the Temporary - Can Emergency Powers be Normalized?


David Dyzenhaus


University of Toronto - Faculty of Law/Department of Philosophy


THE SECURITY OF FREEDOM: ESSAYS ON CANADA'S ANTI-TERRORISM BILL, Ronald J. Daniels, Patrick Macklem & Kent Roach, Eds., University of Toronto Press, November 2001

Abstract:     
I argue that a liberal democracy which wishes to respond to an emergency must do so by declaring a state of emergency and then dealing with the situation in accordance with the rule of law. Terrorism statutes seek to use the ordinary law to deal with such situations and inevitably both include highly political and vague definitions of their targets and relax the society's commitment to the rule of law. The experience of such statutes is universally dismal and the best hope we have once they are enacted is the judiciary. But then the experience we have of judges when it comes to terrorism statutes is also quite dismal.


Not Available For Download

Date posted: February 17, 2002  

Suggested Citation

Dyzenhaus, David, The Permanence of the Temporary - Can Emergency Powers be Normalized?. THE SECURITY OF FREEDOM: ESSAYS ON CANADA'S ANTI-TERRORISM BILL, Ronald J. Daniels, Patrick Macklem & Kent Roach, Eds., University of Toronto Press, November 2001. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=299980

Contact Information

David Dyzenhaus (Contact Author)
University of Toronto - Faculty of Law/Department of Philosophy ( email )
78 and 84 Queen's Park
Toronto, Ontario M5S 2C5
Canada
416-978-6935 (Phone)
416-978-2648 (Fax)

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,140